Is design dead?
Is design dead?
The articles was very interesting because it explains the differences between planned and evolutionary designs with good examples what is software architecture. I agree totally with the author because I think, developers should use de planned design instead of the most common that is evolutionary design. The evolutionary design is the one that grows as the system is implemented, nothing is tested before implementation, so that makes a great mess with systems that were implemented in a wrong way.
I think planned design is the best because developers do not need to code anything until the complete design of the system is finished, also designing software is collaborative and can improve quality of the system. It is important to know and design how to scale software in order to no user more resources than expected, is a good practice to do good things before start to code.
I think is a good idea to become a software architect if you have the right leadership to guide programmers in order to deliver software with high quality, and as the author said, being an architecture is enjoyable because they think they are doing an important job.
I agree with my classmate Alexis Rubio when he said that architecture is important for business in order to be clearer or more transparent for the clients.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario